Capcom Returning Resident Evil 7 to its Survival Horror Roots. But How Much Damage Has Already Been Done?

Fans finally have Capcom by the face.  The key is to not let go

In a recent interview with MCV (found here), Capcom has announced recognition of the negative feedback surrounding 2012's Resident Evil 6 and have stated that the next title on the docket, Resident Evil 7, will be a return to the classic horror gameplay on which the series' predecessors were founded.  That's right, the very core element of the franchise, neglected by its own creators, is finally making a comeback.  It only took Capcom ten years worth of screaming fans to realize it (though I'm sure the poor sales of RE6 rung in their ears louder than any fan's plea ever could).

Its a bit of an odd coincidence that barely three days ago, I posted my thoughts on Dark Souls II and my fear the series is slated to follow in Resident Evil's footsteps.  As a game gains recognition, its very understandable for publishers and developers alike to ask, "What we can do for the next game that will equate to even more recognition?"  And unfortunately, most companies narrow their vision to the most short-sighted answer possible; to integrate current popular features into their titles in order to set their scopes on the mass market. And we see the result time and time again; the sequels disappoint, sales begin to drop, the company tries to recover by implementing even more elements they think the general public craves (cover based shooting, weapon crafting, multiplayer) only for it to backfire with the sound of a million angry nerds.  But low and behold, history is destined to repeat itself, and even more up and coming game companies eagerly line-up for the guillotine titled, "Franchise Suicide," so long as the severed head can rest comfortably on a pillow of dollar bills.

Maybe this is just my naive observation, but it seems a lot of the companies making these mistakes are non-western developers trying to appeal to a western audience.  Just look at how Japanese publisher Square-Enix has transformed the Final Fantasy series over the years; catering more and more to a primarily North American audience (for gods' sake, Final Fantasy XIII features a character named Sazh Katzroy, a black man with an afro housing a baby Chocobo).  Capcom is still trying to scrape the bottom of the ice-cream carton that was Resident Evil 4's explosive success in the west.  And now Namco Bandai is presenting clear signs of similar strategies regarding the upcoming Dark Souls II.  I understand there is good reason to aim your product at a target, especially one as big as the Americas and Europe, but publishers make the constant mistake of thinking only one type of gamer exists in these countries.  I've said it before and I'll say it again; there is an alarming disconnect between publishers and their consumers and its plaguing the game industry.

Nope, I wasn't kidding

But let's switch back to Capcom.  Here we finally witness a company admitting its recent faults and actually announcing planned changes to alleviate these stumbles (if you can call ten years of bulldozing yourself into a hole "stumbling").  That's right fellow Resident Evil fans; we're finally getting the attention we've begged for and its paying off with a whole genre revival.  However, let's not get too excited all at once.  If we're being honest here, there is no way in hell Capcom would be reverting the series back to its roots if Resident Evil 6 had turned the profit they expected.  No matter how many more message boards, forums, and blogs continued to erupt with fan disappointment, Capcom would continue to follow the guaranteed cash flow.  They would drive thirty more stakes into the heart of the games we love until they soaked up every last drop of golden blood from the dead corpse.  And because I'm so sure of that fact, I will remain extremely suspicious regarding Resident Evil 7.  Personally, no amount of good news from the mouths of Capcom could undo the years of outright ignoring the very fans who breathed life into their company and kept it alive.

Shifting gears from all the negativity, I wanted add that I'm very proud of the gamers and reviewers alike who covered Resident Evil 6 justly.  All of the long-time fans who weren't afraid to proclaim that the game was full of flaws and without an identity (as much as it hurts to admit that one of your favorite franchises of all time is no longer what is used to be).  Gamers have always been pushovers, to a silly degree.  We'll get on the boycott bandwagon for a game one day, but the second we see something that suits our fancy, we're off preordering the Ultimate Limited Collector's Edition for $150 of our hard earned cash.  But while 5 million sales is still way too high for such a mediocre game, I'm glad that Capcom got a clear message from its fans regarding Resident Evil 6; "We do not want this."

Remember, in a capitalist economy, your dollar is your vote.  What you do and don't spend your money on could very well guarantee that thing's success, failure, change, or even revival.  I urge not just gamers, but all members playing a role in this society to really take your purchases to heart.  If you don't agree with something and it doesn't meet your standards, the best way to send a message of your distaste is to not buy it.  Show companies that they can't coast by with mediocrity and that we have standards.  Demonstrate that we're not a "one size fits all" audience and that some of us will not pump out money for what is merely a passing grade.  It comes down to us standing by our wants and using our power as consumers to steer the gaming industry to a place of quality, where publishers, developers, media, and players can all benefit equally.

Why I'm Worried About Dark Souls II

Every death is a lesson.  Fans of FromSoftware's Dark Souls know this all too well, as 2011 became the first time gamers embraced masochistic difficulty levels since the days of the NES.  Rightfully marketed through the tagline "Prepare to Die," Dark Souls is heralded as one of the most punishing, yet rewarding experiences of this generation.

Predictably enough, a sequel has been announced for the end of March 2014.  We've seen a few gameplay demos from E3 and a teaser trailer featuring some additional unseen footage, but the majority of Dark Souls II information remains hidden from the public.  So why is it that long-time fans of Dark Souls and its spiritual predecessor Demon's Souls seem so worried about the direction the series may go?  Well, here are a few reasons:

Hidetaka Miyazaki, Director and "Godfather" of Demon's Souls and Dark Souls will not be a part of the Dark Souls II development process

In a preview featured on Edge's Online iPad app, Miyazaki states, "I will not be involved in the actual development of Dark Souls II.  I want to clarify that I will be a supervisor, not the actual director or producer." He goes on to clarify, "There will be two directors for Dark Souls II, which I have secured myself", and later admits, "The decision about the new assignments was not made by me; it was made by FromSoftware and Namco Bandai as a whole."

"It was a company decision," clarifies Namco Bandai producer Takeshi Miyazoe.

This is a problem.  You may be asking, "Well 'supervisor' still means he'll still have a big role, right?"  But, from the rest of the interview, it doesn't sound likely.  Supervisor, in this case, seems to be more apt to making sure projects are starting on the right foot and backing away to let the teams do their parts.  Again, this is a problem.  Its hard to know exactly where the fault lies or what transpired to lead to this "company decision."  Regardless, Miyazaki, an ambitious genius in crafting Dark Souls' ambiguous and mysterious world, is going to be missed.  I think Edge's staff said it best:

"This is a crushing revelation for any hardcore fan of Demon’s Souls and Dark Souls, akin to a cinephile learning that Pulp Fiction 2 is in production, but that Quentin Tarantino isn't attached to the picture."

Dark Souls story was not easy to follow and is scarcely present if you ask any casual player.  Aside from an opening cinematic and a few vague cutscenes, the narrative at hand essentially takes a backseat to the tight gameplay and obscene challenges.  But ask any hardcore Dark Souls fan, and they'll explain to you why the game has some of the deepest, darkest, and most satisfying lore to uncover that really makes your experience come full circle.  Instead of lengthy cutscenes and blatant statements of objectives, Dark Souls' dramatic story is only present in the little details of the world.  Through item descriptions, load screens, NPC dialogue, artistically crafted environments, and a lot of fan driven speculation, the history of this intertwined adventure starts to slowly make sense, as you see connected spiderweb of events and characters begin to make itself apparent.

Miyazaki intended it this way.  He has said before how he wanted the narrative of Dark Souls to be very Wiki driven and how important it was for the community to use their collective imaginations to fill in the gaps.  And he was right.  There is no doubt in my mind that the Dark Souls wouldn't be what it is today if they weren't forced to come together to exchange information and ideas regarding items, factions, world traversal, secret collectibles, and lore.  Without such a bold story, its safe to say that this dungeon crawler would not still be one of the most talked about games in the last few years.  Hidetaka Miyazaki will be sorely missed and we can only hope that his absence does not hinder the incredible story presentation of this franchise.

Tomohiro Shibuya, co-director of Dark Souls II, goes on to state that the themes, including the story, will be more straightforward

"I personally feel that the covenant system was something that was difficult to fully absorb and experience [in] Dark Souls, and I intend to make it more accessible to players. And that's not just with the covenant system, but with a lot of other aspects that I felt were difficult to adapt to. I will follow the same concepts as Dark Souls, but there were a lot of hidden story elements that some players may not have caught before, and I'm hoping to make some of that a little bit more clear or directly expressed to the player as well - not just in the story, but messaging. A lot of elements were very subtle in Dark Souls, and that was something that was characteristic to Dark Souls. But I personally am the sort of person who likes to be more direct instead of subtle, so I think that part of me will [result in] a difference [for] players when they pick up Dark Souls II. It will be more straightforward and more understandable."

Well, it looks as though my fears have already been confirmed (though, I will admit, a lot of this information could have a different meaning than how it sounds due to errors in translation).  I understand what Shibuya is going for; you spend time creating an expansive, interconnected world with a rich history, and yet half of the players who pick up your game will never understand it.  I agree, that is a shame.  A bigger shame, however, is thinking the solution is to go in the exact opposite direction with story presentation and bash the player over the head with elements and secrets that would have been a hundred times more rewarding to figure out on their own.  It seems like the co-director is misunderstanding exactly what has driven the Dark Souls community for so long and why we are so encompassed and dedicated to its lore.  Its the mystery and the gradual linking of the missing pieces that gives the experience such a gratifying overtone.

One thing story writers need to understand is that if a reader/player/watcher is into what you're presenting, they will dedicate themselves to figuring it out, no matter how vague.  This is exactly the force behind George R. R. Martin's successful A Song of Ice and Fire series.  The storytelling is vague and slow, yet deliberate and interconnected.  Fans have been reading, guessing, speculating, and interweaving the story for decades because that's half the fun of taking part in the adventure.  You can't appeal to everyone; some people are completely okay watching Game of Thrones on HBO to get their fix, but its the dedicated fans and their continuous activity that gave Game of Thrones the opportunity to exist as a show at all.  Without the original fans, without the hardcore readers and lore junkies, the series would not be what it is today.

Shibuya describes vehicles as something they want to implement in Dark Souls II

"We want to constantly think of something new that hasn't been tried before, so that's where that idea [of the chariot] came up."

A chariot?  Vehicles?  Possible horses/mounts?  My first question is "why?"  Looking back on the entirety of Dark Souls at no point do I stop and think, "You know what would make this section better?  A chariot.  Or a horse to ride."  It wouldn't fit with the overworld layout whatsoever (lots of tight corridors, dense forests, dark caverns, and castle halls) and definitely wouldn't make world traversal any easier (or maybe it would make it easier, and that would for sure be a problem considering the difficulty and dreaded danger of getting from one end of the level to the next is a key aspect in the game).

It seems as though they're trying to take a page from other RPG books.  "Is your game in a medieval setting?  Well, then you need horses and horse combat!  Didn't you hear?  That was all the rage in Skyrim!"  But what major publishers are missing is that not every game is supposed to be Skyrim.  I like Skyrim, but I don't want to buy another copy of it every single year, trudging through the same motions with mimicked gameplay elements and story ideas.  Not every RPG needs to be a strict copy of one another, in fact, that is exactly why Dark Souls is so incredibly refreshing!  And speaking of Skyrim...

Namco Bandai, Dark Souls publisher, wants to treat Dark Souls II like a AAA title in order to "widen the net"

"Demon's Souls, it was very focused, small-scale.  We're treating this [Dark Souls II] as a massive, massive triple-A title.  We're going to go guns-blazing with it, and hope to God that it works.  We're going after people who love and adore Dark Souls, while hopefully widening the net a little.  I'm not saying that every Skyrim player's going to be jumping on Dark Souls, but it would be nice if some of them did."

This statement, delivered by Lee Kirton of Namco Bandai's PR, nearly sends me over the edge.  It just goes to further show how completely out of touch video game publishers are with their consumer base.  Dark Souls was built upon a small, but loyal fanbase.  Dark Souls also sold incredibly well thanks to the word-of-mouth delivered by these fans.  But that's never enough is it?  Namco Bandai wants more; they see the RPG world as a large piece of cake, and currently Skyrim is holding the biggest slice.  As if players only want to play one type of game, over and over and over again, and can never buy or play another game so long as they own that first game.  Its incredibly insulting that RPG fans are getting lumped into one synonymous group that can be tricked into purchasing a game because it has the same features as Skyrim, or vehicle sections.

Widening the net is exactly what caused the downfall of games like Dragon Age 2, Assassin's Creed 3, Dead Space 3, Resident Evil 6, and Mass Effect 3; they have been trying to capture a bigger audience by implementing the elements that are popular at the time (3rd person cover shooting, large cinematic set pieces, weapon crafting) meanwhile throwing out all of the aspects that made the original fans fall in love, and support, the series in the first place.

Nothing is more upsetting to me; seeing an incredible IP become franchised and strapped to a milking machine the second it gains sizable attention.  The vultures swoop in to reap every drop of success they can get out of it before the sales figures start to drop.  And the worst part is, the publishers will never learn.  They'll blame the poor sales on "poor marketing strategy" or "distribution issues," never getting to the real heart of the issue; they alienate the fans that held the series on their shoulders for so long while trying to capture new fans who will never care enough to support the longevity of the franchise.

But maybe that is the age we live in; I mean, even indie titles, the rare breath of fresh air that broke the monotony of this generation are being honed in on by Sony and Microsoft (even Nintendo is starting to hop on this bandwagon) because of their growing popularity.  Both companies understand that controlling this emerging market will be key to controlling the large sum of money flow and downloads come the next wave of consoles.  All I know is that it worries me and I hate seeing series that I once loved and dedicated my time and money to get destroyed in the process of waging war over the biggest slice of the consumer pie.

Not every title needs to be AAA (isn't it funny how lately, the term AAA is more of an insult than it is a badge of honor?  To me, AAA means "cranked out as fast as possible for the sake of maintaining market share").  Its okay to capture a niche market and its okay to be satisfied with high praise and good sales instead of hungering for more money while throwing all excellency out the window.  Its incredibly short-sighted and only compounds the evidence that publishers really don't give a shit about the creative properties they manage.  They would see them all burn to the ground if it meant making another dollar.